| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Project Three Peer Review Form

Page history last edited by Sue Muecke 9 years, 11 months ago

Project Three Peer Review Form

 

Please thoughtfully answer the following questions about the rough draft you're evaluating.  As always, feel free to provide any other comments, recommendations, or critiques that occur to you.

 

1.  Does the paper clearly define the problem it is responding to?

 

2.  Does the paper have a clear audience in mind?  Will the audience care about the problem?  Will the audience be in a position to do something about the problem?

 

3.  Does the paper convince you that the problem is a problem and that we need to do something about it?  Why or why not?

 

4.  Does the paper detail the proposed solution(s) and explain how it/they would be implemented?

 

5.  Does the paper clearly explain why we should implement its specific solution(s) and how it/they would solve the problem?

 

6.  Evaluate the proposal: do you think the proposed solution(s) would solve the problem?  Do you think the proposal is feasible or practical?  Why or why not?

 

7.  List some counterarguments to refute this paper's argument.

 

8.  What is the strongest element of this project?  Why?

 

9.  What is the weakest element of the project?  Why?  How would you improve/strengthen that element? 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.